<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Putter Talk</title>
	<link>http://www.puttertalk.com</link>
	<description>Putter Talk is the worlds largest putter website with putter reviews, putter history, and general putting tips.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Srixon Z-UR Series</title>
		<link>http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/02/15/srixon-z-ur-series/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/02/15/srixon-z-ur-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 02:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Doug</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Golf Balls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/02/15/srixon-z-ur-series/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<IMG class="thumb" SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Srixon_ZUR/Srixon_ZUR_Thumb.jpg">When an angry ball with jagged teeth tells you to get my "Sricks-On"...you listen! (Especially when Jim Furyk is standing behind him with his arms crossed!) We take the Srixon Z-UR series balls for a test drive and find that it doesn't take a $50 bill to get performance from a golf ball.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you think of a golf ball, the first name that pops into your head isn&#8217;t Srixon&#8230;but maybe it should be. With more than 530 patents on ball design worldwide (that&#8217;s almost 2X as many as the next closest) Srixon certainly is at the forefront of the technology behind the modern golf ball. In the last few years, this technology has brought more yardage, more spin, and larger price-tags.</p>
<p><IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Srixon_ZUR/Srixon_ZUR_5.jpg"></p>
<p>The most common reason behind someone&#8217;s golf-ball choice is not what they tell you. If I ask 10 people what ball they play and why, the answer I&#8217;ll hear 8 times is &#8220;Because it is the best for my game&#8221; when in reality, the answer is REALLY &#8220;Because that&#8217;s what everyone else is playing&#8230;and they are expensive, so they are better.&#8221; When I&#8217;m plopping down my hard-earned money for a dozen eggs, I want more than <b>marketing</B> as my reason.</p>
<p>The Srixon Z-UR series balls are the &#8216;Premium&#8217; line from Srixon. With a street price comparable to &#8220;B-Level&#8217; balls, I felt that these were certainly worth a look&#8230;and boy am I glad I looked. So as the <A HREF="http://www.srixon.com/balls_selector.html" target="new"> jagged-toothed golf ball</A> told me, it&#8217;s time to get our &#8220;Sricks-On.&#8221;</p>
<p><IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Srixon_ZUR/Srixon_ZUR_1.jpg"></p>
<p>The Z-UR series comes in three flavors. Z-UR, Z-URC, and Z-URS. All three have the same 330 dimple pattern and ultra-soft urethane cover. The difference lies in the core materials and the size of the boundary layer. I had to look closely to see that this was indeed a 3-piece ball. The fusion between the urethane cover and the boundary material is very good&#8230;and they are both white in color. It is quite amazing how different three balls can feel so different off of a putter face. Proof that there really IS science behind these products.</p>
<p><b>Z-UR</B><br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Srixon_ZUR/Srixon_ZUR_2.jpg"></p>
<p>This is a 3-Piece ball that is built for high trajectory. This does NOT translate into the softest feeling ball on the green. When I laid out 6 of each to randomly putt 6-footers with, the Z-UR would always make its self known by sound. I don&#8217;t think that it PUTTED any differently, but it was always apparent what ball was just struck. If you buy a sleeve to try for yourself, I&#8217;m quite sure that you&#8217;ll come to the same conclusion.</p>
<p><b>Z-URS</B><br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Srixon_ZUR/Srixon_ZUR_3.jpg"></p>
<p>The Z-URS is aimed at the &#8220;Pro-V1&#8243; Player. The feel, and even sound, are very similar. I won&#8217;t speak to the Driver/Iron playability of the ball, but from a putting stance, I felt that this ball had a very similar feel. It was soft off the face, and the slippery cover got it rolling right away. Seeing that the cover is a little thicker than the other &#8220;Premium&#8221; balls on the market, I can&#8217;t imagine that it will be any less durable.</p>
<p><b>Z-URC</B><br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Srixon_ZUR/Srixon_ZUR_4.jpg"></p>
<p>Marketed as a &#8216;lower spin&#8217; ball, the Z-URC is aimed towards the player that&#8217;s looking for the feel of the Z-URS, without the high spin off the driver&#8230;but what does this have to do with putting? The Z-URC and Z-URS feel almost identical to me. I&#8217;ve even gone back and forth without being able to tell the difference with a pile of them in front of me. This is REAL good news to the player that likes a lower spin ball. Normally, we&#8217;re stuck with a ball that sounds like a piece of gravel on the green&#8230;or a $55-a-dozen price tag. This ball offers the whole package, with a respectable $35 street price. </p>
<p><b>Skip to the end recap:</b><br />
I&#8217;m no scratch golfer&#8230;not even close. But I DO like the option of playing a &#8216;Premium&#8217; ball, without feeling it in the wallet every time one finds its way into the woods, or a water hazard. With all the technology of balls costing nearly 2X as much, and a street price that&#8217;s easy to justify, the Srixon Z-UR series ball really delivers.</p>
<p>Now if I can just figure out how to get that little jagged-toothed guy to talk smack to my playing partners on the course&#8230;</p>
<div class="cr_title">Specs</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
Company: Srixon<br />
URL: <A HREF="http://www.srixon.com/balls_selector.html" target="new">http://www.srixon.com/</A><br />
Street Price: $35.00 - Per Dozen</p>
<p>Size: 1.680&#8243; (42.69mm)<br />
Weight: 1 5/8oz (46gr)<br />
Dimple Depth: 0.007&#8243; (0.19mm)<br />
Construction: 3-piece<br />
Outer-Most Cover Thickness: Varies<br />
Seamless: No<br />
No of Dimples: 330
</p></div>
<p><B>Audio Coming Soon!</B></p>
<div class="cr_title">Z-UR</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Srixon_ZUR/Srixon_ZUR.png"></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Srixon_ZUR/Srixon_ZUR.wav">Click here to listen!</A>
</div>
<div class="cr_title">Z-URS</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Srixon_ZUR/Srixon_ZURS.png"></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Srixon_ZUR/Srixon_ZURS.wav">Click here to listen!</A>
</div>
<div class="cr_title">Z-URC</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Srixon_ZUR/Srixon_ZURC.png"></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Srixon_ZUR/Srixon_ZURC.wav">Click here to listen!</A>
</div>
<div class="cr_title">Control Ball - Maxfli Noodle</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
<B>Audio</B><br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Nike_Juice/Maxfli_Noodle.png"></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Nike_Juice/Maxfli_Noodle.wav">Click here to listen!</A>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/02/15/srixon-z-ur-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Titleist Pro V1 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/01/07/titleist-pro-v1-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/01/07/titleist-pro-v1-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Doug</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Golf Balls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/01/07/titleist-pro-v1-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<IMG class="thumb" SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Titleist_ProV1/Titleist_ProV1_Intro.jpg">Ask any golfer what the best ball in the world is, and you'll get one answer. Find out how the Pro V1 stacks up on the flat-stick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The average (15+ handicap) golfer aspires to be able to make it through a round without loosing a single ball. When I was a 25 handicap, I had one round where I hosed 12+ balls into rattlesnake-infested OB. I mention this, because I was smart enough to be playing Noodles that day,if I&#8217;d been playing Pro-V1s, I&#8217;d have had a MUCH worse round. At $58 a dozen, this isn&#8217;t a ball for those of us that loose more than we keep in a round.</p>
<p><IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Titleist_ProV1/Titleist_ProV1_1.jpg"></p>
<p>The Pro V1, and it&#8217;s lower spin/less dimple brother, the Pro V1x are known the world over as the &#8220;Best&#8221; ball you can buy. Sometimes the world is right. According to Titleist, &#8220;The Titleist Pro V1 golf ball provides improved launch conditions for longer distance while maintaining superior Drop-and-Stop performance into and around the green.&#8221; But what about ON the green? That&#8217;s where we come in!</p>
<p>Pro V1<br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Titleist_ProV1/Titleist_ProV1_3.jpg"></p>
<p>Pro V1x<br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Titleist_ProV1/Titleist_ProV1_4.jpg"></p>
<p>The 3 and 4 piece constructions are pretty cool when you cut them open to look. I had NO idea that the cover was that thin, but after I halved one of each, I found the info readily available on Titleist&#8217;s web site. Who knew! What I thought was interesting was the difference in materials, how different they look on the inside, and how they feel nearly identical on the putter. The Pro V1x has a slightly higher &#8216;click&#8217; than it&#8217;s brother, but with earmuffs on, they felt identical. (Yes, I actually tried it with earmuffs.)</p>
<p>The Urethane Elastomer cover is soft, and gives you very nice feedback whether it is a 3, or 30 foot putt. The putter seems to react quite nicely to this ball. We tested this ball with carbon steel, and stainless steel putters and both felt equally nice. I&#8217;m fairly certain that Titleist plans on releasing a newer &#8220;seamless&#8221; version of this ball in the very near future. I&#8217;ve seen pros that are testing this ball now, and think that it can only mean great things for an already fantastic ball.</p>
<p><IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Titleist_ProV1/Titleist_ProV1_2.jpg"></p>
<p><b>Skip to the end recap:</b><br />
The Pro V1&#8217;s virtues off the green have been discussed to extremes. There isn&#8217;t anything left to say in that department. I&#8217;m saying here and now that this is one of the nicest putting balls on the market. The sonic feedback is fantastic, and the feel on the putter is superb. The price tag is the only issue for a lot of golfers. Is it worth it for the high handicapper? No. Go spend $15 on a dozen balls at your local golf store, and save the remainder for lessons. When you get to the point where you can play a round without loosing more than 2 balls, go get a set of $20 bills out of your wallet and pick up a dozen Pro V1s. You&#8217;ll immediately see what all the fuss is about.</p>
<div class="cr_title">Specs</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
Size: 1.680&#8243; (42.69mm)<br />
Weight: 1 5/8oz (46gr)<br />
Dimple Depth: 0.007&#8243; (0.19mm)<br />
Construction: 3-piece (Pro V1) 4-piece (Pro V1x<br />
Outer-Most Cover Thickness: 0.032&#8243; (0.81mm)<br />
Seamless: No<br />
No of Dimples: Pro V1=392 Pro V1x=332
</div>
<div class="cr_title">Titleist Pro V1</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
<B>Audio</B><br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Titleist_ProV1/Titleist_ProV1.png"></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Titleist_ProV1/Titleist_ProV1.wav">Click here to listen!</A>
</div>
<div class="cr_title">Titleist Pro V1x</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
<B>Audio</B><br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Titleist_ProV1/Titleist_ProV1x.png"></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Titleist_ProV1/Titleist_ProV1x.wav">Click here to listen!</A>
</div>
<div class="cr_title">Control Ball - Maxfli Noodle</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
<B>Audio</B><br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Nike_Juice/Maxfli_Noodle.png"></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Nike_Juice/Maxfli_Noodle.wav">Click here to listen!</A>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/01/07/titleist-pro-v1-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nike Juice 312 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/01/06/nike-juice-312-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/01/06/nike-juice-312-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 00:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>localfitch</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Golf Balls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/01/06/nike-juice-312-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<IMG class="thumb" SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Nike_Juice/Nike_Juice_Intro.jpg">Destroying everything from gum ball machines to birthday cakes, does this "ginormous" new ball mean big things on the green for Nike?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance, the new Juice 312 ball from Nike seems to be a strict case study in the limits of golf ball marketing.  Everything from the package design to the price seems to push the boundaries.  I heard rumors several months back that this ball will be replacing the Mojo line, but have yet to see any solid evidence of the Mojo going away.</p>
<p><IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Nike_Juice/Nike_Juice_1.jpg"></p>
<p>The Juice ball is a low compression, low spin ball that&#8217;s geared for more yardage off the tee.  When I found myself rolling several putts with this ball, a few things stood out right away about its appearance.  First, the 312 dimples are far less than many others that have been pushing almost 400 dimples.  This makes for what appear to be 3 dimple sizes that look larger than other balls.</p>
<p>The alignment aide on the Juice balls is the word &#8220;GINORMOUS&#8221;, found on one side of the ball, making me fumble around a little to find it before each putt.  I would have liked to see a variety of words on balls in the other sleeves in the box, perhaps something along the lines of &#8220;MASTODONIC&#8221; or &#8220;HERCULEAN&#8221;.</p>
<p><IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Nike_Juice/Nike_Juice_2.jpg"></p>
<p>Putting with the Juice was a lot of fun.  I rolled a dozen from varying distances with a Scotty Cameron Circa &#8216;62 # 3.  I had no problems sinking putts at any distance, and felt that the ball rolled true.  The feel of the ball seemed a little more firm than the Maxfli Noodle control ball, and sounded a bit crisper off the face.  I also rolled a few, alternating with a Nike One Platinum and found the same higher pitched sound with the Juice.  I think the sound had a lot of impact on my perception of the ball feeling firm, but perception is reality on the greens.</p>
<p><b>Skip to the end Recap:</b><br />
Fun ball to putt with, staring at &#8220;GINORMOUS&#8221; all day on the green can only give you confidence.  A dozen Juice 312&#8217;s are completely worth it if you can find them on sale.  MSRP of $28 seems a little high, however, for a two piece ball with large dimples.</p>
<div class="cr_title">Specs</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
Size: 1.683&#8243; (42.77mm)<br />
Weight: 1 5/8oz (46gr)<br />
Dimple Depth: 0.007&#8243; (0.19mm)<br />
Construction: 2-piece.<br />
Outer-Most Cover Thickness: 0.093&#8243; (2.38mm)<br />
Seamless: No
</div>
<div class="cr_title">Nike Juice 312</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
<B>Audio</B><br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Nike_Juice/Nike_Juice.png"></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Nike_Juice/Nike_Juice.wav">Click here to listen!</A>
</div>
<div class="cr_title">Control Ball - Maxfli Noodle</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
<B>Audio</B><br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Nike_Juice/Maxfli_Noodle.png"></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Nike_Juice/Maxfli_Noodle.wav">Click here to listen!</A>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/01/06/nike-juice-312-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maxfli Fire Balls</title>
		<link>http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/01/04/maxfli-fire-balls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/01/04/maxfli-fire-balls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 03:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Doug</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Golf Balls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/01/04/maxfli-fire-balls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<IMG class="thumb" SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Maxfli_Fire/Maxfli_Fire_Intro.jpg">Maxfli has the #2 ball in Golf right now with the ever-present "Noodle." Can lightening strike a second time with a "Fire" ball?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Maxfli website says the new &#8220;Fire&#8221; ball has a &#8220;Combustible core compound providing explosive power.&#8221; What that translates to on the green, is anyone&#8217;s guess. I chose the Maxfli Noodle as our &#8216;control&#8217; ball, so it was only fitting that the first ball review be another Maxfli ball.</p>
<p><IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Maxfli_Fire/Maxfli_Fire_1.jpg"></p>
<p>I got 2 dozen of these for Christmas last week, so wether or not I like them, I&#8217;ll be using at least 23 of them next season. (I had to saw one in half for the pictures.) My Dad said &#8220;These are supposed to replace the Noodle next year.&#8221; I&#8217;m not sure where he got that info, but according to Maxfli, the Noodle isn&#8217;t going anywhere in the foreseeable future. On to the Fire ball.</p>
<p>The first 3 putts with this ball dropped in the hole like there was a magnet. I started thinking that this was the ball for me. It turned out to be dumb-luck, but I had a good feeling about this ball out of the gate. I&#8217;m a firm believer in practicing with the same ball you use on the course. If you are using a Pro-V1 in your office, and then a Nike Mojo on the links, you are going to putt it differently. Should it matter? No. Does it? Yes. It&#8217;s all about the sound the bal makes on YOUR putter, and how hard/soft you perceive it.</p>
<p><IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Maxfli_Fire/Maxfli_Fire_2.jpg"></p>
<p>&#8220;Blazing Ball Speed&#8221; doesn&#8217;t help too much with putting, so I was real interested in how it feels when putting. The standard putter that I use for testing balls, is a Cabon-Steel Scotty Cameron 009 Prototype. It&#8217;s a solid putter, and makes a great sound on the control ball. I am immediately listening for the sound that the ball makes. Too &#8216;clacky&#8217; and it&#8217;ll seem harder than it really is. Too soft, and you get the opposite effect.</p>
<p>The Fire has a sound that&#8217;s nearly identical to a Noodle. I imagine that this is because the same Surlyn cover is used on both balls.. The cover thickness is nearly identical on the Noodle and Fire. While the sound doesn&#8217;t seem to be that big of a deal in a review, when you putt with one, it really does matter.</p>
<p>Cutting these balls in half, I discovered that the Noodle is a 2-piece ball, while the Fire has 3-pieces. I also discovered that the core is NOT combustible as they claim. I had my lighter on the core for a good 15 seconds, and all I managed to do was melt it and make a bunch of smoke that set off the alarm in the kitchen. What I would have done HAD it combusted is another story&#8230;I guess I&#8217;m glad they were wrong about that part. Does this help us on the green? No. I just thought I&#8217;d throw it out there in case anyone cared.</p>
<p><IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Maxfli_Fire/Maxfli_Fire_3.jpg"></p>
<p>3-foot, 6-foot and the break putts all dropped like usual. This ball was very easy to get used to when going back and for the between Fire and Noodle. There really want that much of a difference. I DID find the little &#8220;fire&#8221; logo to be distracting to line putts up with. The text on the rest of the ball is a little larger than I think it needs to be. There is something about a thick font on a ball that&#8217;s distracting to me.</p>
<p><B>&#8220;Skip to the end&#8221; recap.</B><br />
For under $20 a dozen, there are a lot of balls that you can buy. How this ball performs off the green is someone else&#8217;s concern. I&#8217;m here to tell you about how it putts. The Maxfli Fire is a VERY nice ball to putt with. Is it a Pro-V1? No. For the money, is it a good deal? All day long. I&#8217;ve got 23 left to hose into the woods this spring. I hope a few of them make it to the green.</p>
<div class="cr_title">Specs</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
Size: 1.680&#8243; (42.69mm)<br />
Weight: 1 5/8oz (46gr)<br />
Dimple Depth: 0.005&#8243; (0.13mm)<br />
Construction: 3-piece.<br />
Outer-Most Cover Thickness: 0.050&#8243; (1.29mm)<br />
Seamless: No
</div>
<div class="cr_title">Maxfli Fire</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
<B>Audio</B><br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Maxfli_Fire/Maxfli_Fire.png"></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Maxfli_Fire/Maxfli_Fire.wav">Click here to listen!</A>
</div>
<div class="cr_title">Control Ball - Maxfli Noodle</div>
<div class="cr_cont">
<B>Audio</B><br />
<IMG SRC="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Maxfli_Fire/Maxfli_Noodle.png"></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.puttertalk.com/media/reviews/Nike_Juice/Maxfli_Noodle.wav">Click here to listen!</A>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puttertalk.com/2007/01/04/maxfli-fire-balls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
